In response to that labour by election win

So 15000 easily influenced voters justifies socialism does it?
Even the late soviet union was more democratic than this - despite only being offered a choice of different representatives from the same party, voters could always tick the 'none of the above' box. If none of the above won then they had to find fresh candidates. I say if 'none of the above' wins, as clearly happened in this case, then the people obviously don't want to be coercively governed. Those 15000 who do could perhaps subscribe to some sort of daily email commands from their chosen leader although it would cost them far more than 60% of their income because they would no longer be able to externalise their costs onto us. There is no logic or rational ethic that would support these 15000 chosing who can coerce the majority. Even if it were 99% coercing 1% that ain't right.
We are individuals not a herd. Chosing your master does not stop you being a slave.

http://www.voluntaryist.com/index.html

http://praxeology.net/molinari.htm

http://mises.org/

http://daviddfriedman.com/The_Machinery_of_Freedom_.pdf

http://c4ss.org/
Centre for a stateless society

http://www.freedomainradio.com/

http://www.youtube.com/user/FreedomainRadio